Friday, October 31, 2008

Courts Affirm Reality, Dump GOP Lawsuit

The Pennsylvania GOP, like many across the country, filed a grab-bag lawsuit against ACORN urging the courts to take immediate action. The GOP arguments, when shown the light of day in court, failed to impress Judge Robert Simpson, Jr., who refused to order ACORN to hand over its voter registration list.

From the article:

Simpson said he was not convinced that the party and its fellow individual plaintiffs can ultimately prove their allegations that ACORN is fostering voter-registration fraud and that the state's election system lacks the safeguards to stop it.


A victory for the reality party!

Friday Humor: Wassup 2008



A brilliant election-year parody of a classic Budweiser/Superbowl commercial from 60frames. (For a refresher on the original "Wassup!" commercial, go here first (or here).)

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Obama is such a Decent Person

He writes kids.

When Amy Mondschein dashed into Solomon Schechter Day School last Thursday, the head of the school and her son's teacher were waiting. The Enfield resident, whose son is a second-grader at the Jewish day school, was running late that day. Was she in trouble?

Far from it.

An envelope addressed to her son, Aron, 7, had been delivered to the school that morning. It was from Barack Obama, senator from Illinois and Democratic presidential candidate.

Live blogging the Carney-Hackett Debate

So here I am in Trout auditorium, listening to a question about the impact of technology on politics, while I live blog. The question come from a session hosted by PCN of a live audience doing a discussion with two BU Poli Sci professors, Dr. Robin Jacobson, and Dr. Atiya Stokes-Brown. Yeah media irony!

Some of the choice call-in questions:

"One is a socialist, the other for corporations, so they are both a problem."

"Who will do more for the uninsured?"

A long question from the audience that seemed to be saying that there is not enough discussion of sexism against Sarah Palin relative to discussion of racism against Barack Obama. I think.

Now they are doing overview of Carney-Hackett debate.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Joe Biden & Bill Clinton in Central PA

You want prominent politicians? We got prominent politicians!

Bill Clinton is speaking TODAY at State College.

  • Wednesday, October 29 at 4:00 pm. Doors open at 2:00 pm
  • Penn State University, Recreation Hall, Corner of Atherton Street and Curtin Road,
    University Park
  • Open to public. Tickets not required. RSVP recommended, http://pa.barackobama.com/UniversityPark


Joe Biden is speaking tomorrow in Williamsport


Anyone attending these events, please give us a summary in the comments.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

A bit of Halloween fun

(Sent in by a CSCC member... enjoy! -JG)

Halloween Blues
by Terri Peterson

'Twas Halloween night and the ghosts were abundant
Though their moaning and wailing seemed somewhat redundant.
Four years of W. rendered the nation
Unable to counter our crushing inflation.
The ghouls couldn't figure what could be more scary
Than a neocon-appointed judiciary.
Witches grimly realized they would never be no
More publicly hateful than Dana Perino.
Dick Cheney steals hope from each heart as he passes,
Mike Chertoff is happy to spy on the masses,
Torture's accepted for interrogation;
Karl Rove spins a tight web of misinformation.
Dubya's last months as commander in chief
Offer anything but what can be termed relief.
Hubris and recklessness mixed with pure greed
Left common dreams strewn in the mean streets to bleed.
Our houses are gone! And our banks are all failing!
700 billion dollar bailouts are bailing.
Emergency management plans are mismanaged.
Health care reform? It seems hopelessly damaged.

But the Bush years are ending, election day's nearing
For months we've heard nothing but conventioneering.
And who has the GOP picked to replace
Dubya and Cheney in this presidential race?
John McCain is the GOP's nominee stooge,
A sellout whose temper is said to be huge,
Nicknamed "McNasty", he flies off the handle
When asked of his role in the Keating Five scandal.
As for Sarah Palin, who's been chosen for VEEP,
The thought of her makes children cry in their sleep.
For deep in the bulb of her power she-mullet,
Lies the knife kept close by to stab moose in the gullet.
McNasty and the V-PILF are deep in cahoots
With CEOs buffing their gold parachutes.
Global suffering from New Orleans to Darfur?
Not important. Most of those people are poor.

The Halloween world demanded reclamation
Of Halloween business and horrification.
Paranoia and fear was their job to foment,
And not generated by one's government.
They looked to the right, who thought none could be tougher,
Than an ex-POW and his wolf-hunting fluffer,
To maintain terror-quo. Our good ghouls were bereft.
Their hearts filled with despair; then they looked to the left.
Look! Barack Obama! Energized by compassion,
Who views social justice as not just a fashion,
Can discuss real concerns without tripping alarms,
Plus, his wife's pretty fierce. Have you checked out her arms?
Joe Biden, an expert in foreign affairs
Has been tapped for V.P.; as a statesman he dares
To put people's needs first before corporate lust.
Both aim, as leaders, to rebuild public trust.

So the ghosts and the witches all hope that you're certain,
When you go to the voting booth and draw the curtain,
To pick the team that inspires hope and not fright,
And vote Obama-Biden on election night.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Rock for Change '08

What a glorious Sunday afternoon! We had beautiful weather. We had bands:



We had brats:



We had a crowd:



And we had Earl Pickens:



CSCC-endorsed candidates Trey Casimir and Steve Connolley both spoke, and a good time was had by all! (Click on pics for larger images)

IOKIYAR Wall Street Journal edition

IOKIYAR- Ee- oh-kee-yar.

Its OK If You Are A Republican.

I love that one. My Father in Law sent me this op ed from the Wall Street Journal by one Pete DuPont called the "Europeanization of America." I point out some of the problems with his list of horrible things that will befall us below. But let me make a metapoint. When it comes to questions of curriculum or culture, the Conservatives are usually quick to invoke the idea of a deep and abiding continuum of "Western" thought from the Greeks through to our own superior culture and soceity. I point out that much of that Western traditions happened, in, you know, Europe. Of course, when it suits their purpose, they are quick to use "Europe," historically and currently a place marked for its unity and homogeneity of peoples, languages, culture, and for its ability to get along just hunky dory without wars of words or weapons, as the qunitessential example of degenerate, misguided and dangerous cultural, social,a nd economic precedent.

Contradiction? IOKIYAR.
Argumentation marked by selective cherry picking of ideas to meet pre-conceived notions? IOKIYAR.

Anyway, back to Mr. Du Pont's list of baseless assertions and falsehoods. My responses come after the arrows --> .

I don't know where they get this stuff. Off the top of my head...

* The U.S. military will withdraw from Iraq quickly and substantially, regardless of conditions on the ground or the obvious consequence of emboldening terrorists there and around the globe.
--> The Iraqi government has signed on to this, so it is what they want. If victory is a sovereign Iraq, then that is prima facie evidence of their sovereignty isn’t it?

* Protectionism will become our national trade policy; free trade agreements with other nations will be reduced and limited.
--> he has said that we should strengthen environmental and labor protections. Ricardo himself, the grandpa of free trade theory, wrote that the factors that matter are natural factors like climate and not artificial ones like costs of labor. Why not have a global wage floor pegged to currency differences. Or at least one for companies operating in the global economy? We have other global regulations for the flow of capital or copyright protection. Fair trade is a real policy agenda, even if he wants to put his fingers in his ears.

* Income taxes will rise on middle- and upper-income people and businesses, and individuals will pay much higher Social Security taxes, all to carry out the new president's goals of "spreading the wealth around."
--> Out of context quote. Obama said we all benefit when there is a middle class that ahs money to spend. Also, is he arguing for an end to progressive taxation? Also, the proportion of the federal budget that comes from payroll taxes has been GOING UP. There is wealth transfer-from the working classes UP, compared to what it was in the past.


* Federal government spending will substantially increase. The new Obama proposals come to more than $300 billion annually, for education, health care, energy, environmental and many other programs, in addition to whatever is needed to meet our economic challenges. Mr. Obama proposes more than a 10% annual spending growth increase, considerably higher than under the first President Bush (6.7%), Bill Clinton (3.3%) or George W. Bush (6.4%).
--. Is he arguing for a contraction of spending in the face of a classic Keynesian fall in aggregate demand? Has he factored in any reductions in military spending?

* Federal regulation of the economy will expand, on everything from financial management companies to electricity generation and personal energy use.
--> I guess because he said so and because Democrats and liberals are the boogey man. BOO!

* The power of labor unions will substantially increase, beginning with repeal of secret ballot voting to decide on union representation.
--> I have mixed feelings about labor organizing and secret ballots vs card checks. However, I don't see the unalloyed evil of increased Union power relative to corporate power.

* Free speech will be curtailed through the reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine to limit the conservative talk radio that so irritates the liberal establishment.
--> As a liberally and free speech lover, I would not favor a return to the fairness doctrine, but more openness of broadband for more forms of communication. Also, we need to stop using copyright as a knee jerk reaction to bolster Disney's profits. In the digital era, everything is a copy, so we need to rethink the balance between fair use and private interests. Anyway, again, has Obama said he wants the fairness doctrine to come back?

Friday, October 24, 2008

McCain in Hersheypark on Tuesday

Just got a call from a friendly McCain robot (does the McCain campaign have any actual humans making calls, or are they all robo-calls?) saying that McCain and Palin will be in Hershey on Tuesday morning, in case anyone is interested in seeing a McCain rally up close and personal.

Details are here. The call (and the website) seemed to imply that you had to pick up tickets in advance from a "Victory Office" (a.k.a. McCain office), the nearest of which (for us) is in Harrisburg. I wonder if that's just to get a head count, or if they are screening people like Bush-Cheney used to do.

On a broader note, I realize that not everyone who goes to McCain-Palin rallies are there because they hate Obama, but more and more devastating videos (like these) are surfacing on the Internet that show people at rallies saying really vitriolic, horrible things. And these are our neighbors--the first video in that link is from Johnstown, PA. What do we (as CSCC, or as individuals) do about this? Not in the context of the election, I mean afterwards. Even if/when Obama wins the election, what can we do to convince people like the ones in these videos that our president is not a Socialist Terrorist? Or that we, as Democrats, are not Socialist Terorists?

At the beginning of this election, I believed fully that Obama was a transformative figure who would change the tone of politics and bring people together. And I do still believe, as Colin Powell said, that he has crossed ethnic, racial and generational lines to do that. But then we have people like this who make our country seem more fractured than ever. What can we do?

Rock for Change This Sunday

(A note about this already went out to the CSCC mailing list, but I thought a reminder would be helpful. This message is from Sue Mahon, of Volunteers for Obama, about the concert on Sunday. Personally, the quote from Earl Pickens cracked me up. -JG)

Dear friends -
I would like to invite you to an all-day rally and free concert this Sunday, October 26th, at Hufnagle Park in Lewisburg in support of the Democratic candidates Barack Obama (President), Steve Connolley (State Representative), Trey Casimir (State Senate), and Chris Carney (U.S. House of Representatives). The concert starts at 11 a.m. and goes until 5pm and the featured acts are: Depotorhead (11am), Faculty Lounge (12 p.m.), The Blind Chitlin Kahunas (1 p.m.), Earl Pickens & The Band Named Thunder (2 p.m.), The Sweetbriars (3 p.m.), and Nicholas Horner (4 p.m.).

Unless you've been living on Mars for the past few years, you will know that this is an amazing line-up of the best of our local bands, all gathered in one place on one day. And all have jumped at the chance to share their music with us in support of our Democratic candidates.

So don't let them down! Or as Earl Pickens, a vocal Obama supporter who had the thrill of opening for Barack Obama at a campaign rally in Lancaster in April after the campaign took note of his "Obama Everywhere" youtube videos, had this to say: “You can't spell 'Barack Obama' without R-O-C-K. Try it. You can't do it. You can only spell 'Baa bama'. And you can't spell 'rally' without "P-I-C-K-E-N-S." Okay, you can actually still spell rally. The point is: this rally is going to rock. Great bands, a great cause, in a great location. What else do you want? Grilled bratwurst? Done. There will be grilled bratwurst at this event. Now you HAVE to go.”

During the concert, there will be a free full kids program, where children can get involved by coloring pictures, making spirit sticks to wave during the shows, getting their faces painted, or playing games with other children. Local artist Nancy Cleaver will also be creating her gorgeous 10' diameter Peace Mandala next to the gazebo.

And last, but not least - especially if it's a bit chilly! - there WILL be grilled bratwurst to warm you up. And hot drinks, hamburgers and chicken. So please do come and join us - and send this e-mail on to all your friends! The concert is open to all and there will be volunteers on hand to answer questions and sign people up if they'd like to help 'Get Out the Vote'. The Obama campaign has organized a final push up to November 4th, and every person interested in helping elect these candidates is encouraged to get involved.Anyone with questions is encouraged to call me at 570-244-6883, Charles Facka at 570-246-8069 or Earl Pickens at 570-522-8123.

[Update:] In case of inclement weather, Brasserie Louis has generously offered to open their doors for us for the event. So thank you, Brasserie! We plan on doing a little drought dance for good weather, but should we not succeed, I can think of no better place to spend a Sunday afternoon listening to great music and mingling with friends and family than the Brasserie. For those of you who don't know where it is - it's at 101 Market Street in Lewisburg. See you there!

Cultural Warrior

Wow! Yesterday Brian Williams asked Sarah Palin if those who bomb abortion clinics are terrorists. She replied "I don’t know if you’re going to use the word ‘terrorist’ there."

Well, I know I am going to use the word terrorist there.

It has come to this: we have a vice-presidential candidate who can openly state that radical rightists who commit violence, often murder, against innocent Americans, should not be termed "terrorists." Her hesitation to label this terrorism is not due to squeamishness about using the word, it must be said.

She tossed out the dog whistle. We're on to the next stage. Unbelievable.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Candidates' Forum

Tonight, the League of Women Voters (LWV) hosted a "Candidates' Night" at Lewisburg High School. In the first half, Steve Connolley (D) and Russ Fairchild (R) fielded questions from the LWV and audience members. In the second half, Trey Casimir (D), Gene Yaw (R) and Mike Dincher (I) did the same. Nothing too controversial or outrageous was said, but I thought I'd share some impressions -- others who were there, please feel free to comment.

Clearest Contrast(s) of the Night #1: Right to Choose
The Senate candidates were asked about their position on a woman's right to choose. Trey gave what I thought was a very clear, well-spoken progressive position: that such matters should be private decisions between a woman, her family, doctor and clergy and that government should stay the h*** out. (That's actually what he said.) This got applause from the audience. Gene Yaw said he was pro-life, with rape, incest, and health of the mother being the only reasons for exception. One person clapped for him, kind of awkwardly. I don't actually remember what Mike Dincher said, but I think it was also basically the Republican position (criminalizing abortion).

Most Unnecessary Question of the Night:
The House candidates were asked about their position on landowners' royalties for natural gas drilling. Since this isn't really very relevant for Union or Snyder counties, it was kind of an awkward moment. This was one of the questions from the audience, written on an index card and pre-screened by the LWV -- it was kind of strange that it was selected.

Clearest Contrast of the Night #2: State Employees/Retirees
The House candidates were asked whether they would support a bill to give cost-of-living increases to state retirees, who haven't had one in at least 7 years while state legislators have voted to increase their own pensions. Russ gave a long answer about cost-of-living increases being a complicated issue and needing actuaries to look at the problem. Steve said: "Yes, I would."

Most Slightly Absurd Statement of the Night:
When House candidates were asked a question about what they would do to get the Shamokin Dam Thruway back on track, Russ Fairchild claimed it had been a "priority" of his, ever since the project was first conceived... in 1968! And yet, we still have no Thruway. Hmm. I think I could see little question marks appear over the audience members' heads.

Clearest Contrast of the Night #3: Healthcare
The Senate candidates were asked about what we can do to reduce healthcare costs. Trey made a bolder statement than Obama in this regard, saying that we should realize we are eventually headed toward a single-payer system like the rest of the civilized world, and we should start preparing for it to make the transition effective and financially responsible. He quoted a statistic that Pennsylvania has a low uninsured rate, with ~92% of the population insured; however, almost half of this is government-sponsored insurance anyway (including Medicare, Medicaid, and the state employees' insurance program). He talked about the need to reduce emergency room visits by uninsured people that are hurting the hospitals.
Yaw and Dincher gave similar answers, with Yaw saying that he was absolutely opposed to government-run insurance because the government wasn't effective at running anything. (Trey later shot back at this, pointing out that we have some very effective government services like police and fire companies (I would have added the USPS), and that Medicare spends about 5-6% of its costs on overhead, whereas some private insurance companies spend up to 50%.) Yaw also made some point about healthcare costs being hard to reduce, because if "a machine" (I assume he meant like an MRI machine) cost $1 million, then that's what the hospital has to spend. He also suggested that the U.S. adopt a strategy like Massachusetts where, since Romney's tenure as governor, they have a mandate that citizens must purchase health insurance, just as PA drivers must purchase car insurance before they can drive a car. Dincher generally advocated a "free market" approach, saying that Americans don't "check their receipt" when they leave a doctor's office or hospital like they do when they leave a regular store, and so the problem is there's no incentive for "smart shopping" or cost containment.
I don't pretend to know a whole lot about this issue, but I do know a little bit, in that I generally work in the healthcare industry. For a good source of information on the subject (and especially healthcare costs in Massachusetts), I recommend Boston University's School of Public Health website. There, some of the things you quickly learn are:

  • Trey's point about Medicare spending less on overhead than private insurers is absolutely correct.
  • Massachusetts (with its insurance mandate) has the highest healthcare spending in the world -- $62.1B in 2006, which is 33% above even the U.S. average, which in turn is higher than any other country.
  • Healthcare costs absorbed 1/4th of U.S. economic growth from 2000-2005.
  • U.S. prices for prescription drugs are 81% above foreign prices.

My understanding is that increases in health insurance premiums have far outpaced inflation or spending on any other sector of the economy in the last decade, and it's due to a combination of increased administrative costs, more expensive new drugs and technology, waste, and fraud/error. And contrary to what Yaw implied, the new drugs and technology costs are not the biggest of those driving factors.

Best (Only) Joke of the Night:
Steve thanked the LWV for hosting the forum, and for printing the "Voter's Guide" that includes bios, descriptions and photos of all the candidates. Steve apologized for not realizing that he was supposed to send in his high school yearbook photo (as Russ Fairchild seems to have done, see PDF link above).

Overall, it was a good, civil discussion of issues without any mudslinging or personal attacks, which is always nice to see. I understand why the LWV likes the format it uses, but it would have been nice to allow the moderator a chance to follow up on questions, or to take more informal feedback from the audience. As it was, with very strictly-timed responses and not much opportunity to build one question onto another, it seemed a little more rigid than it needed to be.

KEEP THE CAPS ON

I've been thinking about the challenge of crafting a message about state and local issues. Here's an idea that might work.

The issue is electricity rate caps. The rate caps have come off in Lewisburg (Citizens Electric) and rates are up significantly (40%?). PPL's rate caps are set to come off in 2010 I believe, but there is still no meaningful competition in the electric market. Even though consumers have forked over something like $13 billion to make that happen, the companies spent the money on other things apparently--or so I'm told.

I don't think a message of "We've been ripped off and we want our money back" is going to work. In the short term, the best we can do is what Gov. Rendell has talked about: delaying the expiration of the rate caps.

Here's my idea for a video message campaign: Person lowers thermostat to 58 degrees, turns to camera, puts on a stocking cap and says: "Lets keep the caps on." The challenge would be to get other people to shoot there own video of themselves putting on a cap and saying, "Let's keep the caps on." The idea plays on the overall energy price problems--more people are shivering because of high fuel oil prices than high electricity prices--but it makes a serious point: real people are going to feel the pinch because of the flaws in Pennsylvania's deregulation plans. Policy makers need to be reminded of that.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Carney Interview

Here is Chris' interview with a blogger. It is more in depth than much that I have seen. I don't know what he is saying about the FISA bill and retroactive immunity...

I'd like as much face time for our little blog!

Jordi

An excerpt:

There is a provision of the Military Commissions Act that says the government can declare a United States citizen an enemy combatant and hold them without habeas corpus.



When you suspend the constitution you have to be little bit nervous about that. I swore a couple of times to protect and defend the constitution both as a military officer and as a member of Congress. You can hold people in this country by charging them under the 5th amendment and charge them with a crime and they get due process. American citizens should not be deprived due process.


So do you favor repealing that provision of the act?


As long as there is a legal way to cover them if they are an American citizen they get full rights as an American citizen.


Is that a yes?


That’s a yes. When we ignore our own rules we hurt ourselves as a nation. We hurt our ethic, we hurt what we stand for in the eyes of our people and the eyes of the world.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Colin Powell Endorsement

Everyone has probably seen it, but in case you haven't, here's the Colin Powell endorsement:



The best part comes at around 5:20 where he explicitly endorses Trey Casimir and Steve Connolley as well!

I'm no Colin Powell fan. But this is a good event for two reasons. One, it pushes the fringe robocalling/Rush Limbaugh element further to the fringe, since a lot of the more moderate conservatives out there will be educated by the far right's reaction to the Powell endorsement. And two, pragmatically, it puts McCain on the defensive in the media for a day or two, which brings us a day or two closer to the election. The analogy in football would be picking up a 1st down while you're running out the clock.

More Letters

I had a letter published in the Daily Item on Friday, a "response to a response."

Steva Stowell-Hardcastle, a CSCC member, had an excellent "My Turn" essay published on 10/9/08 about some of the intolerance and racism that canvassers for the Obama campaign have encountered in this area. A few days later, this letter was published. Not only did it try to equate Steva's essay with "race-baiting," but it also made an outrageous assertion, suggesting (without sarcasm) that Republicans might actually get killed if they try to canvass in "any major city" (which seemed to be some kind of secret code for places where scary people live). I felt compelled to respond with the following letter:
I believe Steva Stowell-Hardcastle's essay about encounters with racism in the Susquehanna Valley was misinterpreted by the gentleman who described it as "race-baiting." She never suggested that racism is limited to Valley residents, or conservatives, or even white people. Her point was that racism is not a family, Christian or American value and should not be tolerated anywhere. The writer, in contrast, seems to suggest that because some black or liberal people may be racist, then people like Ms. Stowell-Hardcastle should not point out racist remarks or attitudes where they see them. I do not understand how he makes this connection. He is right that racism is not just a white behavior. But it is a learned behavior, often passed down between generations, and it can be "unlearned," too. The first step is to recognize it, call it out and be vigilant in making clear that our society will not tolerate it anymore. That goes for Americans of all races and political persuasions.

Finally, the writer claims that Obama campaigners should be thankful to campaign "freely and safely" here because if a Republican campaigned in "any major city" (meaning where non-white people live?) they would be physically harmed. It is exactly this kind of unfounded accusation that allows otherwise well-intentioned people to continue believing that racist words "aren't hurting anybody," and racist fears and attitudes are justified. Besides the fact that the writer offers no evidence of any such incidents, McCain has offices in most major cities, including Philadelphia and even Los Angeles. Let's agree that to change racist attitudes in the Valley and this great country of ours -- from all sides -- we need to hold everyone to a higher standard as the writer suggests and let facts, not fears, be our guide.
I am glad that my letter got published, but man! I couldn't believe that they published the other letter in the first place.

The link to Steva's original essay seems to have disappeared from the DI site, but I will try and find a link or post an original copy soon, because it is well worth reading.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Amercian Fascism raises its head

Who knows if she is out of line or represents a new strain of media saavy American Fascism, but
CONGRESSWOMAN Michelle Bachman, yes, an elected official, calls for investigations into "un-American" activities of her fellow elected officials.

She constantly conflates liberal, leftist, and un-American in a noxious cocktail of McCarthyism, Nixonian innuendo, and demagoguery.

Video


Katrina Vanden Heuvel of The Nation and Pat Buchanan respond.

Friday, October 17, 2008

ACORN and NY Times

NY times editorial page tackles ACORN false scandal. They are mostly on target. I couldn't resist posting a comment.

Here it is:
1% of 1.3 million registrations is 1,300.

Think of ACORN as a business, like hiring people at an airport to solicit credit card registrations.

And add the fact that all registration forms MUST be turned in. Otherwise, you can have canvassers collect registration forms, and then throw out all the Republican ones. Wouldn't that be bad? So, turning in all of them seems like a good idea.

And then those forms are checked by election officials to make sure they are correct. ACORN flags those forms it thinks are flawed. So, those 1,300 flawed (we do not know intent of person who filled them out, so I won't say fraudulent) are then weeded out. By two rounds of quality control: first by ACORN, and second, by the good-intentioned and hard-working election officials.

Isn't that, you know, the system WORKING?

And, how many service companies that process paperwork in our society have a 1% error rate?

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Anti-Obama Truck(s): Update

(This message is from Rick Thomas, UCDC Chair, and seemed like the kind of thing we should all be made aware of. -JG)

I don’t know how many of you heard the story on WKOK today about the weirdness on Market Street Wednesday afternoon. Here’s a report on WKOK’s web site:

Anti-Obama sign called ‘distasteful’ in Lewisburg

LEWISBURG – What most called a “distasteful” political sign caught the
attention of Lewisburg residents Wednesday afternoon. The sign, sitting in the
back of a pickup truck in the 300 block of Market Street showed a picture of
Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama, smoking a cigarette and wearing
a hat shaped like an acorn.

On the sign, the words, “Fellow members of ACORN will help me form my
administration…Thanks, you made it happen.” Nancy, of Lewisburg, found the sign
offensive. She said no matter which political party you favor, it is unfair
politics and not the way we should be voting.

Union County Chairman of the Republican Party, Yvonne Morgan, agreed,
saying she thinks it promotes ill will among citizens in Union County. She also
said she tried to contact the police, but they told her it was free speech. No
word on who owns the truck or who put up the sign. (Sara Bartlett)

I saw a picture of the truck, and it was truly strange. But I saw something today that was down right scary. On my way from a meeting at the Best Western near Country Cupboard today around noon, I heard the report on WKOK. Three vehicles in front of me was a pick up truck (an older Ford F-350 with a King Cab, dark green in color, and with a chrome trim around the top of the bed) and I noticed a fairly large sign across the top of the back window. Now, bear in mind that there were two cars in front of me and that I couldn’t read the license plate, but I had no problem reading the sign across the back. It said “BASH A MUSLIM. BASH OBAMA”

Now, while the truck parked down town may have been just weird, and perhaps DID fall within the realms of free speech, I’m not sure the guy driving the truck I saw would fall into that same category. BTW, the truck I saw was NOT the truck that was in town. I followed the truck up Water Street, and he then turned left and crossed the bridge, heading east. I turned right and stopped by our campaign office and the Obama office, just to see if anyone else has seen this particular vehicle running around town. They hadn’t.

I’m asking that folks keep an eye out for this vehicle. I really think that this guy has crossed the line not only of truthfulness, but also seems to be encouraging physical violence to both Muslims and a presidential candidate. If anyone can get a license number for this truck, please write it down and get it to me. I will turn it over to the police and to the PA State Democratic Committee, with the request that the driver of the truck be questioned as to just what the intent of the message is. I believe it’s a fair question to ask. The Secret Service might be interested in it, too.

But I would ask that YOU not be the one to encounter the owner of the vehicle, in that if he’s encouraging violence, he’s liable to not stop at just Muslims and presidential candidates.

Thanks,
Rick

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Post-Debate Thread

What did you think of the third presidential debate?

Anti-Obama Truck in Lewisburg Today

Apparently, there is currently a large truck parked on Market St., Lewisburg with a large billboard on the side showing a cartoonish picture of Obama, condemning his ties to ACORN (the organization of community workers who the conservatives have lately been accusing of voter registration fraud).

Can anyone get a picture of this? And/or find out who is responsible for sponsoring it?

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

"Increasingly Feisty" Crowd at Palin-Hackett Event

Sarah Palin was on the stump in Scranton today, and Chris Hackett opened for her. According to the Times-Tribune, the crowd booed loudly whenever Hackett mentioned Obama, and one man shouted "Kill him!" (Scroll down to 1:25 pm.)

Hackett didn't denounce his supporter.

Monday, October 13, 2008

How the right will try and steal the election

I think the chances that they can actually change the outcome of the election are small. But they will try through a variety of means. I hope our local UCDC and state party is on top of this. Furthermore, these kind of stories point out why election reform should be a constant issue for the progressives and CSCC.

The Right, and I don't know how much it is the official Republican party or a shadow party that operates as a network of activists in the party and in various outside groups, have a variety of tools at their disposal

- Confuse the issue of fraud in registering and fraud at the ballot box. If Mickey Mouse registers, Mickey Mouse will not vote.
- Invoke false history about how Kennedy did it in 1960, so we it all ends justifies means this time around.
- Push laws or execution of laws that result in purging people from polling registers. Sometimes this is legal, think FL felons being purged by law. In that case, we need to fight those laws. Other times they use such laws to purge many people who should not be.
- Use direct marketing data, like change of address cards, to cross reference voting registers so they can challenge voters at the polling place. Even if the voter is eventually cleared, or given a provisional vote, this tactic drums up fear that there is something "afoul" with the voting process since X number of people were challenged. It also has the benefit of making people nervous that they have done something wrong. The whiff of criminalization probably makes some voters antsy (especially those historically subjected to disenfranchisment efforts like poll taxes).
- Invoke the FL 2000 mess as the frame that the 'systems is broke." Where broke for them means that too many Americans who "don't think like us" are trying to vote.
-Systematically underfund poorer or more dense areas to create long lines.
-Fight a national work holiday for elections (I mean, good grief!).

Even if none of this yields them the election, it does allow them to sulk for 8 years and claim that the Obama and the Democrats "stole" the election for the "true" Americans. Yes, and with all the racist and nativist undertones that feeling carries.

We need a landslide not just to win, to reverse policies, to change course. We need a landslide to so utterly crush the conservative movement that it is forced to rethink itself and its ideas.

They are drowning. Throw them an anvil.

This very good piece from Huffington Post addresses the ACORN lies:
The facts about ACORN are worth getting out. ACORN is an organization that, among other things, registers low-income people to vote. One of the ways they do this is to hire door-to-door canvassers from the neighborhoods they are working in. This sort of work is tightly regulated. So, when one of the thousands of people they give jobs to doesn't do their work right and brings back bogus or phony voter registration cards, the law REQUIRES that ACORN turn the forms in to the voter registration office. The law, rightly, doesn't want anybody throwing out voter registration forms for any reason.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Voting Abstinence

Some more election humor, this one from Stephen Colbert. Hey, you know a sketch is good when it pulls off a good Michael Dukakis joke....

Friday, October 10, 2008

Treys commercial



Help Trey get to Harrisburg! http://www.trey4pa.com/
Donate through ActBlue: http://www.actblue.com/contribute/entity/20638

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Former Republican Praises Obama

At Huff post today, I read this piece by Frank Schaeffer.

Aside from his general optimism, he makes two points that I have not heard enough about. Maybe these will work in persuasion, in GOTV, in getting our own grandmothers and other fellow White Americans over their reluctance.

One, Obama is a really nice guy.

Two, he is very brave. He is calm and cool when every day he goes out knowing that he is in real physical danger.

As Schaeffer points out, the Presidency is dangerous to White presidents. Obama was appointed Secret Service protection earlier than anyone else running for president. Police arrested a man with a gun in his car near his home.

Now, as the election heats up, like steam escaping from a river rock in a bonfire, we are seeing cracks form and hearing loud ugly pops in the body politic. The McCain surrogates can not let go off vicious and inflammatory charges. People have been yelling threats at McCain-Palin rallies to the tune of "terrorist" and "kill him!"

The economic crisis, as it spreads into consumer confidence drops, reduced consumption, and possibly a deeper recession will exacerbate people's fears and invoke zero sum gain thinking.

Yes, McCain was resolute in his POW experience. But Obama shows his own courage in the face of threats of violence.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

The Inestimable Earl Pickens

Lewisburg's very own Earl Pickens got some nice coverage from ABC News in Harrisburg. In Earl's words:

Sorry to distract from all the so called "important issues" and whatnot (BO-RING!), but everyone knows that this election will be decided not by the many complex problems facing America today, but by obscure Pennsylvania country singers and their insipid, lighthearted political sing-song ditties. Pat "She's A Moose Shootin' Mama" Garrett and I went head-to-head on ABC News out of Harrisburg this morning and I've got the URL to prove it.

Which goes to show, grassroots can take many forms, including guitar-shaped.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Post-Debate Thread

What did you think?

Pre-Debate Thread

About one hour to go until the 2nd Presidential Debate. Check back here afterwards to post your reactions.

For those of you with C-SPAN, they've been showing the 10/15/92 "town hall" debate with Bush, Clinton and Perot. Amazingly, it actually seems like a real town hall where they picked people out of the audience who were allowed to direct their questions to the whole group and who were allowed to pose follow-up questions. As I understand it, in tonight's debate, the questions will be asked by audience members, but the questions were all pre-selected, the audience members are not allowed to go off-script, and not allowed to pose follow-up questions. And the moderator isn't allowed to ask follow-up questions, either. And there will be no direct cross-questioning between the candidates.

How is this a town hall, again? And how is this a debate?

Poll Numbers with Buzz

Lots of CSCC people have been reading and talking about Nate Silver's election polling website FiveThirtyEight.com. If you haven't seen it, it's worth a look. (538 is the total number of electoral votes.)

Nate Silver first got major attention on the night of the Indiana and North Carolina primaries when his projections managed to capture the movement toward Obama that all the other polling had missed. In recent weeks, Nate Silver has had a lot of exposure in the Main Stream Media, and he is, as he puts it, "enjoying his fifteen minutes." Silver is careful to note that he's an Obama supporter, but he also has a stake in making unbiased prediction, unlike many of the polls that he interprets based on their track records.

PA GOP gets a case of the nasties

The way the national parties let their state parties do the dirty work reminds me of conservative love of state’s rights. Right to suppress votes, right to limit choice, right to defund schools, right to pollute etc.

Right to smear too, apparently.

Pa. GOP hits rock bottom: Calls Obama "a terrorist's best friend"

“What does it say about the character of Barack Obama that he knowingly associates with terrorists? It tells me that Obama lacks the judgment and character to be our next Commander-in-Chief.”


http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/GOP_hits_rock_bottom_Calls_Obama_in_an_official_release_terrorists_best_friend.html

Monday, October 6, 2008

Biden and Palin debate on SNL

Saturday Night Live continues to have fun with the political season. Tina Fey continues to fly back to NY from California in the hopes that getting us to laugh on Saturday will make us want to watch 30 Rock on . . . what night is it on?

http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/blog/2008/10/love_or_hate_he.html

Friday, October 3, 2008

Friday Afternoon Entertainment

It's Friday, so kick back and relax with Earl Pickens:




And by “relax” I meant, of course, get up and volunteer!

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Post VP Debate Reactions

What did you think?

Countdown to Meetup & VP Debate Tonight

If you're reading this blog, you probably already know that CSCC has a meetup tonight. If not: hey, we have a meetup tonight! :) 7:30pm, see the website for details.

And then we're going to watch the VP debate together... it's 2 and 1/2 hours away now! Please check back here afterwards where we'll be posting reactions, and you can leave your comments and impressions of the debate.

While we're waiting, here's some links you may enjoy: